Frequently Asked Questions About
Message in a Bottle

With
ANSWERS BY NICHOLAS SPARKS

Why did Garrett have to die at the end of the story?

Because the story was inspired by my father and that's what happened to him, I thought it best to end the novel as it did for me in real life. (See Background Information on Message in a Bottle.) Also, I write tragedies or novels with bittersweet endings, and tragedies by definition are just that. Romeo and Juliet had a far more tragic ending by the way, and I don't read a lot of complaints about that story.
At the same time, I thought the conclusion gave the novel deeper meaning. Had it been a "happily ever after" ending, the story would have become melodramatic (melodrama, by definition, requires a happy ending), and I don't write melodramatic stories. I write bittersweet or tragic stories.

Will there be a sequel to Message in a Bottle?

Currently, there aren't any plans for that, though I can't say there will never be a sequel. I enjoyed writing Theresa Osborne's character, and if a good story comes up that can use her again, I just might.

Did I like the film?

Yes I did.

Why was the film different from the novel?

It wasn't all that different, in my opinion. Yes, there were small changes (A) the introduction of Catherine's family, B) Theresa had been demoted to an assistant, C) Deanna was eliminated, D) Garrett didn't teach diving anymore, E) Garrett died rescuing someone instead of simply being caught in a storm), but other than that, the story followed the novel fairly closely. The major theme was the same, the major characters were the same, the story was essentially the same, and the ending was the same.
The reasons for those changes have to do with the fact that films are a different medium than novels, and what works in a novel won't necessarily work on film. I'll go through those changes and give the reasons, just so you'll understand the give and take in such a process. A) Catherine's family was introduced to create conflict. In the novel, Garrett's conflict could be explored with introspection, but that's impossible to do on film, since we can't simply shoot a scene of Garrett "thinking." We had to "see the conflict," -- hence the introduction of Catherine's family. In both cases, there was conflict; it was just done in a different way. B) Theresa had been demoted in the film because it was necessary to have her "complete a journey" i.e. learn something from all she went through. In the beginning, she was an assistant, as her relationship with Garrett blossomed, she began writing for the newspaper. By the end, she had her own office. As in the novel, she "grew." C) Deanna was eliminated because Theresa's job had changed. Her character was replaced with someone younger, but essentially the same; funny, sharp and someone who cared about Theresa. D) Garrett didn't teach diving because of time constraints -- it was either teach diving or restore sailboats. We chose the latter because it seemed more original and interesting. E) Garrett rescued someone because it was important to show that he hadn't gone out into the storm to commit suicide. In the book that was clear, but had someone not read the novel and just seen the movie, it wouldn't have been apparent, since he was an experienced sailor. Hence, to make it plain that Garrett was ready to move on, he died through no fault of his own.

Tell me about the letters in the novel. Were they easy to write?

No, each letter took about a day to get just right. There's a fine balance between being too sweet and cloying, and writing something meaningful and memorable. Based on the response to those letters, most readers thought I did it just right.

Why was it so much longer than The Notebook?

Because the story was more complicated. There were more relationships to explore, the novel covered a longer time period, their were different settings, and the relationship itself was longer as well.

Were the characters based on anyone you know?

Though it was inspired by my father, the characters were largely products of my imagination.

Was it easy to write from the perspective of a thirty-six year old, divorced woman?

It wasn't as hard as I thought it would be. With any character, authors try to imagine themselves as that person, and creating a character like Theresa simply takes the form of questions. How does she see her life? What bothers her about men? How does her son influence any relationship she might have? Does she feel overwhelmed at times? I simply answer those questions as the character might, and soon enough, the character begins to take shape.

Were the flashbacks easy to work into the story?

Once I figured out I needed them in the story (see Notes on the Writing of Message in a Bottle for more information) they weren't too hard, other than finding their proper placement.

Did you meet Kevin Costner, Paul Newman and Robin Wright Penn?

Yes, no, and yes. They were both very gracious, professional and wonderful with which to work. (And yes, Kevin Costner is good-looking in real life, too).